| |
 |
Return to Publications
Figure in the Carpet March 2004
Vol. II, No. 7
|
| Editor's
Notes |
| |
February is Black History Month. Because I come from a place
where everyone is more or less the same color, the idea of a
month celebrating the achievements and contributions of a minority
based on its skin color was something I only gradually understood.
In fact, my first indication of the cultural implications of
skin color in the United States came in 1983 with my arrival
and made sense to me only much later. I was exhausted when I
arrived at the airport in New York. No one was there to welcome
me to this new world, but I had been directed to take a taxi
to the Chinese Consulate hotel. It was 11:00 pm as I pushed my
two seventy pound suitcases out into the dark night toward the
taxi stand. I was relieved to see a big yellow taxi pull up and
have someone lift my luggage into the car. I was more relieved
that the driver politely understood my tangled English pronunciation
of my destination. He even took my heavy luggage up the stairs
to the registration desk. I had not paid attention to his skin
color until then - he was black. He asked for exactly what I
had been told was the appropriate fare and, struggling with the
new currency, I paid him that amount. To this day, I regret that
I did not know enough to give him a tip for his kindness. He
might never know that I grew up in a culture that did not tip
and I now wonder if he walked back to his taxi thinking that
Chinese are cheapskates. As he drove off, I remember that I walked
into a Chinese conversation about another guest at the hotel
who had just been robbed by a black teenager and a warning that
I should be careful or black people would rob me, too. I was
too tired to appreciate the irony of that experience then, but
it was my first lesson in the racial politics of the United States.
Later as I settled into the predominantly white campus population
at Harvard, I forgot all about that first evening. The fact that
I could forget about it should have been my second lesson. Despite
what my Physical Anthropology courses taught me, namely that
human skin color is the result of a people’s past environment,
and inconsequential to the universality of most human traits,
this attribute seemed to have a disproportionate cultural side
effect. It was easy to see that the majority of workers doing
menial labor on campus were black. Although both Asians and African-Americans
could easily be discriminated against on the basis of physical
appearance, Asians in 1980s Cambridge seemed to be exempt. Whether
it was being part of a ‘model minority’ or the benefits
of the civil rights movement that insulated me from experiences
that would have made my race an issue, I am not sure.
I am certain, however, that discussion of race in America is
a complex and potentially perilous enterprise. This is true even
in places devoted to rational discussion of social issues. Last
September, for example, Professor Early gave a well-received
talk at the Law School on issues surrounding the call for slavery
reparations by some African-Americans. Yet, rather than a discussion,
he was the subject of a personal attack in Student Life. Small
wonder racial issues are rarely the chosen focus in less ‘enlightened’ forums.
Black History Month should be the one time each year when Americans
of all colors could discuss these issues. Unfortunately, most
of what I hear simply points back to the ideals of integration
and equality in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, not to the problems
that remain. Perhaps this is why most of these commentaries are
embedded in memorials of the man who symbolized that dream for
so many Americans - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This is a fitting
memorial to Dr. King, but it ignores both the other things he
fought for and the thousands marching alongside him on the road
to civil rights.
The reason Dr. King is important to the American Dream is not
limited to his 1963 “I Have a Dream” speech, the
first televised and unedited presentation of the undeniable justice
of black demands, or its famous reference to his children by
being “judged by the color of their skin but by the content
of their character.” It is that he also recognized economic
justice as a part of that equality. The freedom so many Americans
of color struggle to achieve and so many immigrants come to America
to find requires an array of realistic choices, and those choices
depend on having at least a certain level of resources. A year
after his Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, King told his Atlanta congregation
that he was “much more than a civil rights leader,” he
said that “there must be a better distribution of wealth…We
can’t have a system where some people live in superfluous,
inordinate wealth while others live in abject, deadening poverty.” If
he were alive today, I wonder what he would say about the current
rate of unemployment, the present tax cuts that give most of
their benefits to the very affluent, or the budget deficits that
threaten our ability to provide for those who never had a chance
to secure the resources necessary to make a realistic free choice.
Much of the weight of unfavorable economic conditions is borne
by black Americans, but all ethnic and racial minorities are
affected.
Perhaps Dr. King would return to the phrases he used so effectively
in 1963, reminding both white and black citizens that “their
destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom bound to
our freedom.” The idea of being bound together reaches
down to our smallest actions. I hope the taxi driver that, in
my ignorance, I failed to tip did not avoid Chinese passengers
in the future or treat them less kindly due to my actions. I
hope that in the future no matter how tired I am I will speak
up when I hear racial stereotypes being used to label people.
We need to remember the kindness we have offered and received
as individuals, and overlook the apparent lack of understanding
for each other’s group efforts as a flawed but truthful
part of our background. Moreover, when we exercise the only real
voice we have to affect economic redistribution in our country,
our votes, we should remember that freedom of which King spoke
that binds us to each other.
Jian Leng, Assistant Director
The Center for the Humanities
|
| The
Summer Writers Institute—A Place for Writers to Grow |
| |
For the past eight summers, Washington University has been host to
a population that might not have been on a college campus for
a long time: a group of adults whose passion is writing and who’ve
come to explore and deepen their connection with their avocation.
These are the participants of the Summer Writers Institute—a
two-week-long intensive creative writing conference sponsored
by University College, the continuing education division of Washington
University’s College of Arts and Sciences. The Institute’s
participants come from a wide range of backgrounds and do many
different things in their “real lives.” Most have
full time jobs (I’ve met teachers, copy writers, a rabbi,
and a psychologist for example.) and have chosen to spend two
weeks of vacation devoted to their writing. Some are retirees
and some are college students. As the Institute’s director
last year, one of the things I enjoyed most was seeing the variety
of people who came to the conference and the excitement they
expressed about learning from one another.
The Summer Writers Institute takes place June 14-25, and its
central component is its workshops in poetry, fiction, and creative
nonfiction
that are held every morning. Afternoons feature readings and craft
talks by a variety of accomplished writers from the area. The Institute
also offers a pedagogy talk, which helps participants who are also
teachers think about new ways to teach creative writing, and is a
lot of fun for anyone who wants to try out new writing exercises.
A panel of editors from local magazines and literary journals meets
to answer questions about publishing, and the participants finish
the two weeks with an open mic event, sharing the writing they’ve
been working on.
In the workshops, students write in their chosen genre with some
of the best writers and teachers in this area, getting feedback on
and direction for their
work. Last year, John Dalton, who taught the fiction workshop, spent hours every
evening reading and commenting on his students’ stories. Ruth Ellen Kocher,
who taught the poetry workshop, gave her students inventive writing exercises
in order to challenge them to try new ways of expression.
The workshops allow students to learn from each other as well, and to develop
a sense of community. Every morning last summer students would gather for coffee
and coffee cake, slightly bleary-eyed, but looking forward to the work ahead.
There, I had the opportunity to listen in on the nonfiction writers discussing
each other’s work. After lunch, I often chatted with a group of poets who
were consistently energized about how much they were learning. It was exciting
to see the writers coming together inside and outside the classroom.
In addition to getting to read the work of and to meet the participants, another
aspect of directing the SWI that I truly enjoy is the process of hiring the workshop
teachers and afternoon speakers. The Institute gives me the perfect excuse to
call up local writers whose work I admire and to talk with them. On a deeper
level, I enjoy being able to connect less experienced writers with the rich resources
of the more established writing community of the St. Louis area. Also, as the
approaches to creative writing are as varied as the writers themselves, and as
one can never truly pin down the dragon that is writing, I value the opportunity
I have during the Institute to sit in on the afternoon events. These are the
times that I become another participant, taking in the beauty of well-chosen
words and the wisdom of talented writers.
With one year of directing the Summer Writers Institute behind me, I’m
especially excited about this summer’s upcoming Institute and the new aspects
to the conference that will occur. This summer there will be a beginning fiction
workshop for those new to the genre and an intermediate/advanced fiction workshop
for returning participants and those with more experience in the genre. And,
as the genre of writing for children is gaining popularity, we’ve added
a children’s writing workshop as well. I hope the Institute will continue
to change and grow this way in future years as we try to create as many writing
and learning opportunities as possible.
I value the Summer Writers Institute because it provides a space for creation
for those who do not usually have enough time to devote to their passion. I value
the Institute’s ability to create a true writing community and a view of
the larger context of what it means to be a writer for those who know that writing
is a solitary and often isolated practice. The Summer Writers Institute provides
both a place of exploration for those who are new to writing and an intensive
period of production and reflection for those who are further along in their
writing journey.
For more information on this year’s Summer Writers Institute, please go
to ucollege.wustl.edu/summerwr or call (314) 935-6759.
Ida McCall is a teacher, a writer, and
the director of Washington University’s
Summer Writers Institute.
|
|
deborah krause gives biblical translation lecture
|
| |
Deborah Krause, Associate Professor of
the New Testament at Eden Theological Seminary, kicks off the
Center for the Humanities
Translation Series with a lecture entitled “Wrestling the
Divine: The Discipline and Art of Translating and Making Bibles.” Krause
received her Masters from Eden and her Ph.D. from Emory University,
and is an ordained minister in the Presbyterian Church (USA).
Her teaching and scholarship focus on methods of biblical interpretation
and their roots in critical theory, theology, and politics. In
addition to a required course in Biblical hermeneutics, Krause
teaches courses in the gospels, Early Jewish exegesis, the Deutero-Pauline
and Pastoral Epistles, and various strains of modern Biblical
interpretation.
The event takes place at 4pm on Tuesday, March 16, in the Ann
W. Olin Women’s Building Formal Lounge on the Hilltop Campus
of Washington University. A reception follows the program. The
event is free and open to the public. For more information, please
call the Center at (314) 935-5576.
|
|
mia yun reads for center's the smartset
series:
where great writers read
|
| |
Author
Mia Yun will be the next visiting writer in the Center for the
Humanities’ The SmartSet Series: Where Great Writers
Read for the spring semester. Yun was born and grew up in Korea. She
graduated from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul and
received her Masters Degree from City College of New York. She
has worked as a reporter, translator, and freelance writer, and
is currently the Korea correspondent for the Evergreen Review.
Her first novel, House of Winds (2000), received widespread acclaim.
Her second novel, Translations of Beauty, is due out in 2004.
Mia Yun will read from her work on Monday, March 29, at 8pm in
Rm 204 of Anheuser-Busch Hall (Law School) on Washington University’s
Hilltop Campus.
She will give a seminar with time for audience questions on Tuesday,
March 30, at 4pm in McMillan Café (Rm 115) in Old McMillan
Hall, also on the Hilltop campus.
Both events are free and open to the public. A reception and book-signing
will follow each event. For more information, call (314) 935-5576.
|
|
|