| |
 |
Return to Publications
Figure in the Carpet May 2005
Vol. III, No. 9 |
Published monthly by The Center for the Humanities
at Washington University. Financial assistance for this project
has been provided by the Missouri
Arts Council, a state agency, and the Regional
Arts Commission.
|
| Editor's
Notes |
| |
The Archaeology of the Center
The
archaeology of a Center may sound strange. Archaeology is generally
described as the study of human societies through the examination
and interpretation of their material remains. Yet, because it addresses
the cultural and social artifacts that direct, shape, and are the
products of material change, archaeology overlaps both the humanities
and the sciences. Intellectual excavation of a Center similarly
overlaps both humanities and social sciences. My purpose here is
not a comprehensive historical survey, but, without digging into
issues of institutional change, we might be tempted to think the
object in question is as it always was—but it is not.
In his article “The Soul of Science”
(American Scientist, March-April 2005), Michael Shermer
notes that, according to Greek legend, Poseidon’s son Theseus
sailed to Crete to slay the monster Minotaur. After Theseus’s
victorious return, his ship was preserved as a memorial by the people
of Athens. As the ship aged, the decaying planks were faithfully
replaced by new ones shaped exactly like the originals. Eventually
all original timbers had been replaced. Shermer repeats the ancient
philo-sophical question: is the memorial ship the same one in which
Theseus sailed? What determines the true identity of the ship, its
shape or the original wood from which it was made? Shermer uses
this story to ask about human identity. The atoms in our brains
and bodies are not the same as those we had at birth, yet the patterns
of information coded in our DNA and neural memories are uniquely
ours. What we are, then, is more than what we are made of—it
is how we are put together.
I raise the issue of change and identity because
of changes in the Center for the Humanities. In some ways it is
the same as always, in other ways it is completely new. But is the
Center its parts, or the pattern of their organization? Imagine
an archaeologist digging through the intellectual stratigraphy of
our Center a hundred years from now. Although the physical site
has changed several times, this archaeologist could easily follow
the pattern of intellectual activity to write a story about the
earliest layers of intellectual and institutional evidence, then
proceed to the present. Trained to excavate carefully, layer by
layer, the archaeologist would note that the Center for the Humanities
was built upon the intellectual foundations of the International
Writers Center. There would be a decade’s worth of material,
cultural, and intellectual remains of the International Writers
Center to sift through and interpret. The thin layer separating
that original edifice from the next layer of activity might be missed,
but shifts in the pattern would show that a period of rapid change
had taken place. New names appear in the institutional records,
new publications, such as Belles Letters: A Literary Review,
appear in the intellectual stratigraphy of the Center. Like Theseus’s
ship, the planks of the earlier structure were replaced by new planks
close in shape to those of the original vessel.
The
intellectual ‘artifact’ you hold in your hands, The
Figure in the Carpet, appears in the archaeological record
at this time and the story behind its name and subsequent events
might cause the archaeologist to infer an intellectual turning point
in the evolution of the Center. The title refers to the last archaeological
deposit of the International Writers Center and foreshadows the
next change. The Figure in the Carpet is the title of one
of Henry James’s (1843-1916) most famous short stories. As
noted in the first issue of The Figure (December 2002), James tells
of the life-long effort by a literary critic to identify the idea
that inspires a particular author and stretches across his work
from book to book. Gerald Early chose this name because it suggests
what humanists often do: try to show readers patterns they might
otherwise miss. Less than a year later, the Center was referred
to by a new name. Institutional records show that the “International
Writers Center” was replaced by “The Center for the
Humanities, Dedicated to Letters and Humanistic research and Their
Presence in Public Life.” As noted in The Figure
at the time,
We hope our new name assures little change
to our commitment to those we proudly serve in the St. Louis literary
community and a lot of change for those who welcome opportunities
to bring together the perspectives of diverse humanities disciplines
under a
single synergistic roof.” (September 2003)
The “most recent” stratum revealed
by this intellectual excavation is the present one. The future archaeologist
would note that a new name appears: “The Center for Joint
Projects in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Intellectual
stratigraphy within this component becomes denser and more varied.
The over-worked archaeologist must move slowly through a larger
deposit of intellectual artifacts. The site of the excavation has
grown far beyond the foundations of the International Writers Center,
and now includes other Centers with their own varied intellectual
histories. Excavation of this uppermost horizon reveals the foundations
of African and Afro-American Studies, American Culture Studies,
International and Area Studies & Overseas Programs, Religious
Studies, Social Thought and Analysis, Urban Initiatives, Environmental
Studies, and Women’s and Gender Studies. The “single
synergistic roof” now covers a vessel much like an academic
Ark where various fields and disciplines of the Humanities and Social
Sciences collaborate to strengthen traditional academic research
and knowledge dissemination, as well as to encourage and support
new modes of inquiry and intellectual outreach.
If Theseus’s ship had become more like
Noah’s Ark in the rebuilding, it would still be a memorial
to Theseus—is our Center still the same now that it is part
of a Center for the Centers? Yes, it is. The ‘essence’
of our Center is more than a pile of academic parts; it is a pattern
of intellectual activity and of commitment to those we serve. Unlike
patterns of information coded in human DNA and in neural memories
that last only a handful of decades, the patterns and memories of
an institution can last for centuries. And as noted when we announced
The Center for the Humanities,
What’s next? The possibilities are nearly
limitless, for the humanities offer as many avenues of inquiry
as there are possibilities in life. As we cannot do everything,
we must choose wisely. Now we begin. (September 2003)
And now as an expanded Center, we can accomplish
a great deal more than could the separate units individually. But
is it the same boat it was originally? Well, are you the same person
you were when you started reading this? Yes, and no. But we sail
on.
This is our last issue of The Figure
in the Carpet until September 2005. We wish all our readers
a peaceful summer, and look forward to seeing you in the fall.
Jian Leng, Assistant Director
The Center for the Humanities
|
Law
and Art:
Intellectual Property and Business
Formation Clinic |
| |
St. Louis features a thriving arts
community, and appreciation for the arts is a defining characteristic
of our local culture. St. Louis also has a lot of lawyers, and stereotypes
might suggest that the legal and artistic communities are unrelated,
polarized segments of the local population. The arts and the law
are closely connected, however, and artists must rely on sound legal
advice in order to protect fully their rights and creations.
During our final semester at Washington University School of Law,
we’ve been able to develop a strong understanding of this
relationship between law and the arts through our experience with
the Law School’s newest clinical program, the Intellectual
Property and Business Formation Clinic. Founded this year by Professor
Charles McManis with a generous donation from the Kaufman Foundation,
the Clinic is one of only a handful of Intellectual Property Clinics
in the country. The Clinic provides law students with the opportunity
to provide legal advice to local innovators and artists, under the
supervision of an experienced Intellectual Property attorney. According
to supervising attorney David Deal, the Clinic’s primary mission
is “to provide a capstone educational experience that allows
the students to take the knowledge they’ve learned in their
substantive legal classes and apply it to practical situations.
In this Clinic, they actually get to work with clients on real legal
problems.”

Students enrolled in the Clinic
are assigned to teams that perform different functions, such as
working with inventors and entrepreneurs, working with nonprofit
organizations, and working with biotechnology research organizations
such as the Missouri Botanical Garden and Donald Danforth Plants
Sciences Center. As members of the “Pro Bono”
team, we were assigned to work exclusively with St. Louis Volunteer
Lawyers and accountants for the Arts (VLAA), a non-profit organization
that provides free legal and accounting assistance to local artists
and arts organizations.
VLAA provides a wide variety of
essential services that allow hundreds of low-income artists and
emerging arts organizations to pursue their creative work, protect
their rights, and develop solid business practices. For instance,
VLAA often aids artists and arts organizations in obtaining tax
exempt status, negotiating and drafting contracts, protecting intellectual
property, and
developing bookkeeping systems. In addition, VLAA also produces
and publishes a wide variety of educational materials that offer
business and legal advice for local artists. For instance, VLAA
publishes a free monthly
newsletter for Missouri and Southern Illinois arts organizations
entitled Arts
Law Memo, and on the VLAA website, you’ll find several
easy-to-understand guides on arts law and business topics such as
intellectual property, financial
management, nonprofit operations, and leadership and personnel management.
Recent publications include articles on the anatomy of a contract,
copyright basics, artist-gallery contracts, leasing studio space,
and the small claims court. As a result of these publication efforts,
artists and arts organizations have access to critically important
information that they
may not be able to afford or locate otherwise. In the literary community,
VLAA has made significant contributions Law and Art: Intellectual
Property and Business Formation Clinic by working to help several
literary organizations obtain tax-exempt status, such as 1,000 Books
and Persian Poetry Circle of Northern America. In addition, VLAA
has helped organizations such as First Civilizations with trademark
and sales tax issues, and helped organizations such as River
Styx to develop their websites.
During our semester in the Clinic,
we’ve been assigned several interesting
projects from VLAA: we’ve written publications on moral rights
and the
budgeting associated with independent music recordings, provided
contract
advice for musicians, web developers, and other artists, and provided
patent and copyright advice to local inventors and filmmakers. In
one notable project, we assisted the Kennerly Church of God In Christ
(located in North St. Louis), whose Reunion Choir had recorded a
CD featuring several gospel songs and a spoken narrative of the
Church’s history. The Church wanted to press and distribute
copies of the CD, but first they had to pay for legal rights to
use the songs, since many of the songs were copyrighted gospel standards.
Unable to pay the steep legal fees
associated with tracking down copyright
owners and arranging for payment of the appropriate royalties, the
Church turned to VLAA, and the matter was assigned to us in the
Clinic. Tracking down the copyright owners of all of the songs on
the CD proved to be an arduous task, and more than three weeks were
spent identifying the proper arrangements of the songs, contacting
copyright owners in the arrangements, and working with music licensing
agencies such as Harry Fox and BMI. Without the free services from
VLAA and the Clinic, the cost of their album would have probably
doubled or tripled. The experience was rewarding for several reasons:
in addition to helping the church, we learned a lot about a useful
area of the law, and we developed a stronger appreciation for gospel
music and traditions.
While the benefits the VLAA provides
for artists are obvious, experiences like
the Kennerly Church project have given us a better understanding
of how volunteer work can gratify the lawyer, as well. Volunteering
and helping local
artists provides the lawyer with a refreshing change of pace from
the typical routine, and it allows the lawyer to help others, strengthen
the community,
and ensure that St. Louis remains a strong arts community with a
unique local culture. Danica Mathes, a local intellectual property
attorney at Blumenfeld, Kaplan, & Sandweiss, is a VLAA board
member who volunteered with VLAA as a law student. According to
Danica, by volunteering as a student, “I was able to get a
feel for the local arts community and the professionals who were
involved with it, as well. Not only did I get great practical experience
that directly related to my career goals, but I was also prepared
for my future contributions as a member of the board...an opportunity
that I do not think I would have had so early in my career had I
not been involved with the organization as a student.”
By establishing the Intellectual
Property and Business Formation Clinic, Washington University School
of Law will continue to provide students with the opportunity to
volunteer and provide important services for local artists and arts
organizations. Volunteering while in school allows the student to
understand the close relationship between arts and the law, and
through the Clinic students will continue to develop an appreciation
not only for the arts, but for the value of volunteering and becoming
a wellrounded, community-minded lawyer.
Andrew Scavotto and Toby Bulloff are
third-year students at Washington
University School of Law; both are
enrolled in the school’s Intellectual
Property and Business Formation Clinic.
|
|
The Center for the Humanities Advisory Board
2005-2006
|
| |
Nancy
Berg
Associate Professor of The Jewish, Islamic, and Near Eastern Studies
Program
Ken Botnick
Associate Professor of Art
Letty Chen
Assistant Professor of Modern Chinese Language and Literature
Robert Henke
Associate Professor of Drama and Comparative Literature
Chair of Comparative Literature
Michael Kahn
Attorney at Law, Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Larry May
Professor of Philosophy
Steven Meyer
Associate Professor of English
Angela Miller
Associate Professor of Art History and Archaeology
Linda Nicholson
Stiritz Distinguished Professor of Women and Gender Studies
Dolores Pesce
Professor of Music
Joe Pollack
KWMU Theatre & Film Critic
Bart Schneider
Editor of Speakeasy
Jeff Smith
Associate Professor of Performing Arts
Director of Film and Media Studies
Robert Vinson
Assistant Professor of History and African and African American Studies
James V. Wertsch
Marshall S. Snow Professor of Arts and Sciences
International and Area Studies
Ex officio
Edward S. Macias
Executive Vice Chancellor & Dean of Arts and Sciences, Barbara
and David Thomas Distinguished Professor on Arts & Sciences |
|
|